From d2c393b8e56ae9559295cba7b3e4e4650dfa24f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: OpenSquared
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:14:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] feat: option lab
---
backend/routers/portfolio.py | 17 +-
backend/routers/saxo.py | 16 ++
backend/services/option_chain.py | 29 ++--
backend/services/options_pricer.py | 42 +++--
backend/services/pricing_check.py | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++
backend/services/strategy_comparison.py | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++
backend/services/strategy_engine.py | 7 +-
backend/services/strategy_optimizer.py | 3 +-
frontend/src/hooks/useApi.ts | 55 +++++++
frontend/src/pages/OptionsLab.tsx | 196 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
frontend/src/pages/Portfolio.tsx | 88 ++++++++++-
11 files changed, 757 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 backend/services/pricing_check.py
create mode 100644 backend/services/strategy_comparison.py
diff --git a/backend/routers/portfolio.py b/backend/routers/portfolio.py
index 2288dd6..66633df 100644
--- a/backend/routers/portfolio.py
+++ b/backend/routers/portfolio.py
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException
+from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Query
import traceback as tb_mod
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import Optional, List, Dict, Any
@@ -179,6 +179,21 @@ def position_payoff(pos_id: str):
return compute_payoff(pos)
+@router.get("/positions/{pos_id}/retrospective-optimal")
+def position_retrospective_optimal(pos_id: str, as_of: str = Query(None)):
+ """"What would have been optimal, in hindsight?" — reprices the position's real legs
+ and runs the Strategy Builder optimizer against the REAL historical Saxo chain and the
+ REALIZED spot/IV move since entry (not a guessed scenario) — see
+ services.strategy_comparison.compute_retrospective_comparison. Expensive (runs the full
+ template-search optimizer), so this is on-demand from the Portfolio position detail, not
+ auto-computed for every open position."""
+ from services.strategy_comparison import compute_retrospective_comparison
+ pos = next((p for p in get_positions("open") + get_positions("closed") if p["id"] == pos_id), None)
+ if not pos:
+ raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=f"Position '{pos_id}' introuvable")
+ return compute_retrospective_comparison(pos, as_of=as_of)
+
+
@router.get("/scenario-exposure")
def scenario_exposure():
"""Reprices every open position under a handful of named macro scenarios (Risk-Off,
diff --git a/backend/routers/saxo.py b/backend/routers/saxo.py
index 1498232..691a614 100644
--- a/backend/routers/saxo.py
+++ b/backend/routers/saxo.py
@@ -248,3 +248,19 @@ def saxo_iv_snapshot(symbol: str):
def saxo_iv_history(symbol: str, days: int = Query(90, ge=1, le=730)):
from services.saxo_iv_engine import get_saxo_iv_history
return get_saxo_iv_history(symbol, days)
+
+
+@router.get("/pricing-check")
+def saxo_pricing_check(
+ ticker: str = Query(...),
+ date_a: str = Query(..., description="YYYY-MM-DD"),
+ date_b: str = Query(..., description="YYYY-MM-DD"),
+ target_dte: Optional[int] = Query(None, ge=1, le=365, description="Overrides the default (expiry closest to date_b)"),
+):
+ """Options Lab — was this option well priced between two dates? Picks the strike closest
+ to the underlying's actual outcome at date_b (hindsight), and by default the expiry
+ closest to date_b too (same hindsight principle, overridable via target_dte), reprices
+ it at both dates from real Saxo history, and decomposes the price move into
+ Delta/Theta/Vega contributions — see services.pricing_check.analyze_option_pricing."""
+ from services.pricing_check import analyze_option_pricing
+ return analyze_option_pricing(ticker, date_a, date_b, target_dte)
diff --git a/backend/services/option_chain.py b/backend/services/option_chain.py
index 5a8e99a..f17e882 100644
--- a/backend/services/option_chain.py
+++ b/backend/services/option_chain.py
@@ -13,9 +13,10 @@ from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
def get_chain_slice(
symbol: str, target_days: int = 8, n_expiries: int = 3,
dte_min: Optional[int] = None, dte_max: Optional[int] = None,
+ as_of: Optional[str] = None,
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
- Builds a chain slice from the latest accumulated Saxo snapshot rows for `symbol`
+ Builds a chain slice from the accumulated Saxo snapshot rows for `symbol`
(services/database.get_latest_saxo_snapshot_rows). Returns the `n_expiries`
expirations closest to target_days, each with calls/puts rows shaped
{strike, bid, ask, mid, last, iv, open_interest, volume} — same shape regardless
@@ -26,19 +27,27 @@ def get_chain_slice(
scenario at a short horizon (e.g. target_days=8) while still building legs from
longer-dated options (e.g. dte_min=20, dte_max=60), which target_days alone can't
express since it drives both the evaluation date and (until now) the expiry pick.
- """
- from services.database import get_latest_saxo_snapshot_rows
- flat_rows = get_latest_saxo_snapshot_rows(symbol.upper())
+ `as_of` (an ISO date/datetime string), when given, reconstructs the chain as it stood
+ at or before that moment instead of "now" — services.database.get_snapshot_rows_asof,
+ same row shape, just filtered by created_at. This is what powers the Portfolio
+ retrospective comparison (services.strategy_comparison): it needs the chain as it
+ really was on a position's entry_date, not today's. Every days-to-expiry figure is
+ computed relative to `as_of` in that case, not date.today() — using today's date to
+ size a historical chain would silently misdate every contract in it.
+ """
+ from services.database import get_latest_saxo_snapshot_rows, get_snapshot_rows_asof
+
+ flat_rows = get_snapshot_rows_asof(symbol.upper(), as_of) if as_of else get_latest_saxo_snapshot_rows(symbol.upper())
if not flat_rows:
raise ValueError(
- f"Aucun historique Saxo pour '{symbol}' — ajoutez-le à la watchlist "
- f"(Config → Saxo) et attendez le prochain cycle de snapshot (~5 min)."
+ f"Aucun historique Saxo pour '{symbol}'" + (f" à la date {as_of}" if as_of else "") +
+ " — ajoutez-le à la watchlist (Config → Saxo) et attendez le prochain cycle de snapshot (~5 min)."
)
spot = next((r["spot"] for r in flat_rows if r.get("spot") is not None), None)
- as_of = max((r["created_at"] for r in flat_rows if r.get("created_at")), default=None)
- today = date.today()
+ snapshot_as_of = max((r["created_at"] for r in flat_rows if r.get("created_at")), default=None)
+ reference_date = datetime.strptime(as_of[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date() if as_of else date.today()
by_expiry: Dict[str, List[Dict[str, Any]]] = {}
for r in flat_rows:
@@ -46,7 +55,7 @@ def get_chain_slice(
by_expiry.setdefault(r["expiry_date"], []).append(r)
def _days_to(expiry_date: str) -> int:
- return (datetime.strptime(expiry_date[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date() - today).days
+ return (datetime.strptime(expiry_date[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date() - reference_date).days
candidates = list(by_expiry.keys())
if dte_min is not None or dte_max is not None:
@@ -98,7 +107,7 @@ def get_chain_slice(
"symbol": symbol.upper(),
"proxy": symbol.upper(),
"spot": round(float(spot), 6) if spot is not None else None,
- "as_of": as_of,
+ "as_of": snapshot_as_of,
"expiries": expiries_out,
}
diff --git a/backend/services/options_pricer.py b/backend/services/options_pricer.py
index 1584112..1be70e1 100644
--- a/backend/services/options_pricer.py
+++ b/backend/services/options_pricer.py
@@ -5,7 +5,10 @@ from datetime import datetime, timedelta
import math
-def black_scholes(S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_type: str = "call") -> Dict[str, float]:
+def black_scholes(
+ S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_type: str = "call",
+ include_second_order: bool = True,
+) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Black-Scholes pricing + Greeks (first-order delta/gamma/theta/vega/rho, plus the
second-order Greeks used by Strategy Builder's "advanced sensitivities" panel: vanna,
charm, vomma/volga, veta, speed, color, zomma — vera deliberately omitted, see project
@@ -16,15 +19,24 @@ def black_scholes(S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_t
is verified against finite-difference bumps of this same function's own first-order
outputs (see scratchpad test_second_order_greeks.py from the Phase 3 build), not just
hand-derived from a textbook, since these third-derivative formulas are easy to get
- subtly wrong."""
+ subtly wrong.
+
+ `include_second_order=False` skips that block entirely — strategy_engine.value_at()
+ (the workhorse of check_bounded_risk's ~700-point grid search per candidate, itself
+ called for every candidate the optimizer scans) only ever reads `["price"]`, so paying
+ for 7 unused derivatives on every one of those hundreds of thousands of calls was pure
+ waste discovered while profiling the Phase 4 retrospective-comparison feature — this
+ flag is what fixed it, not a hypothetical optimization."""
S = float(S or 100.0)
K = float(K or S)
T = float(T or 0.001)
sigma = float(sigma or 0.25)
if T <= 0 or sigma <= 0:
intrinsic = max(0, S - K) if option_type == "call" else max(0, K - S)
- return {"price": intrinsic, "delta": 0, "gamma": 0, "theta": 0, "vega": 0, "rho": 0,
- "vanna": 0, "charm": 0, "vomma": 0, "veta": 0, "speed": 0, "color": 0, "zomma": 0}
+ result = {"price": intrinsic, "delta": 0, "gamma": 0, "theta": 0, "vega": 0, "rho": 0}
+ if include_second_order:
+ result.update({"vanna": 0, "charm": 0, "vomma": 0, "veta": 0, "speed": 0, "color": 0, "zomma": 0})
+ return result
sqrtT = math.sqrt(T)
d1 = (math.log(S / K) + (r + 0.5 * sigma ** 2) * T) / (sigma * sqrtT)
@@ -44,6 +56,17 @@ def black_scholes(S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_t
theta = (-(S * phi_d1 * sigma) / (2 * sqrtT) - r * K * math.exp(-r * T) * norm.cdf(d2 if option_type == "call" else -d2)) / 365
vega = S * phi_d1 * sqrtT / 100
+ result = {
+ "price": round(price, 4),
+ "delta": round(delta, 4),
+ "gamma": round(gamma, 6),
+ "theta": round(theta, 4),
+ "vega": round(vega, 4),
+ "rho": round(rho, 4),
+ }
+ if not include_second_order:
+ return result
+
# Second-order — same for calls and puts (this pricer carries no dividend yield, so the
# extra q-term that would otherwise make charm/veta/color differ by option_type is zero).
vanna = (-phi_d1 * d2 / sigma) / 100
@@ -54,13 +77,7 @@ def black_scholes(S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_t
color = (phi_d1 / (2 * S * T * sigma * sqrtT) * (2 * r * T + 1 + d1 * (2 * r * T - d2 * sigma * sqrtT) / (sigma * sqrtT))) / 365
zomma = (gamma * (d1 * d2 - 1) / sigma) / 100
- return {
- "price": round(price, 4),
- "delta": round(delta, 4),
- "gamma": round(gamma, 6),
- "theta": round(theta, 4),
- "vega": round(vega, 4),
- "rho": round(rho, 4),
+ result.update({
"vanna": round(vanna, 6),
"charm": round(charm, 6),
"vomma": round(vomma, 6),
@@ -68,7 +85,8 @@ def black_scholes(S: float, K: float, T: float, r: float, sigma: float, option_t
"speed": round(speed, 8),
"color": round(color, 8),
"zomma": round(zomma, 6),
- }
+ })
+ return result
def compute_pnl_curve(
diff --git a/backend/services/pricing_check.py b/backend/services/pricing_check.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0876d33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/backend/services/pricing_check.py
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+"""
+Options Lab — "was this option well priced between two dates?" A fine-grained pricing audit
+for a single contract on an instrument, reusing the same `as_of` historical reconstruction
+built for the Portfolio retrospective comparison (services.strategy_comparison /
+services.option_chain's as_of param — see project memory).
+
+The strike is chosen WITH HINDSIGHT: the one closest to where the underlying actually ended
+up by `date_b` ("as if we'd guessed the strike correctly"). That's deliberate — a contract
+near-the-money-at-the-outcome is the one whose value is most sensitive to the realized move,
+which makes it the most revealing lens on whether the volatility priced in at `date_a` was
+actually justified by what happened, rather than picking an arbitrary strike that stayed
+deep OTM/ITM the whole time and would show almost nothing either way.
+
+The price move for each leg is decomposed via its own real Greeks at date_a — Delta×Δspot +
+Theta×elapsed_days + Vega×ΔIV — the "explained" move; whatever's left over ("residual") is
+what a pure Black-Scholes/Greeks story doesn't account for (gamma curvature, skew shift,
+liquidity/spread noise, or a genuine pricing anomaly).
+"""
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
+
+
+def _realized_vol(yf_ticker: str, date_a: str, date_b: str) -> Optional[float]:
+ """Annualized realized vol of the underlying's own daily closes over [date_a, date_b] —
+ compared against the option's implied vol at date_a to answer "was IV a good forecast
+ of what actually happened," the classic IV-vs-RV question."""
+ import numpy as np
+ from services.data_fetcher import get_historical
+
+ hist = get_historical(yf_ticker, start=date_a, end=date_b, interval="1d")
+ closes = [h["close"] for h in hist if h.get("close")]
+ if len(closes) < 3:
+ return None
+ log_returns = np.diff(np.log(closes))
+ if len(log_returns) < 2:
+ return None
+ return float(np.std(log_returns, ddof=1) * np.sqrt(252))
+
+
+def _leg_quote(rows: List[Dict[str, Any]], expiry_date: str, strike: float, option_type: str) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
+ for r in rows:
+ if r.get("expiry_date") == expiry_date and abs((r.get("strike") or -1e9) - strike) < 1e-6 and r.get("option_type") == option_type:
+ bid, ask = r.get("bid") or 0.0, r.get("ask") or 0.0
+ mid = r.get("mid") or (round((bid + ask) / 2, 6) if (bid > 0 and ask > 0) else 0.0)
+ vol_pct = r.get("volatility_pct")
+ return {"bid": bid, "ask": ask, "mid": mid, "iv": (float(vol_pct) / 100.0) if vol_pct is not None else None}
+ return None
+
+
+def analyze_option_pricing(ticker: str, date_a: str, date_b: str, target_dte: Optional[int] = None) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+ from datetime import datetime
+ from services.database import get_saxo_option_symbol_for_ticker, get_snapshot_rows_asof
+ from services.option_chain import get_chain_slice
+ from services.options_pricer import black_scholes
+
+ saxo_symbol = get_saxo_option_symbol_for_ticker(ticker)
+ if not saxo_symbol:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"'{ticker}' n'est pas lié à un chain Saxo (Config → Instruments Watchlist)."}
+ if date_b <= date_a:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": "La date de fin doit être postérieure à la date de départ."}
+
+ # Same hindsight principle as the strike selection below: by default, target the expiry
+ # closest to date_b (not an arbitrary fixed DTE) — so the contract is still evaluated
+ # right around the moment we actually care about, rather than risking one that's been
+ # expired for weeks by date_b just because target_dte was picked independently of it.
+ # An explicit target_dte still overrides this, e.g. to deliberately look at a
+ # longer-dated contract than the comparison window itself.
+ if target_dte is None:
+ target_dte = (
+ datetime.strptime(date_b[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date() - datetime.strptime(date_a[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date()
+ ).days
+
+ try:
+ chain_a = get_chain_slice(saxo_symbol, target_days=target_dte, n_expiries=1, as_of=date_a)
+ except ValueError as e:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"Pas d'historique Saxo au {date_a} : {e}"}
+
+ expiry = chain_a["expiries"][0]
+ expiry_date = expiry["expiry_date"]
+ spot_a = chain_a["spot"]
+ strikes_a = sorted({row["strike"] for row in expiry["calls"]} | {row["strike"] for row in expiry["puts"]})
+ if not strikes_a or spot_a is None:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": "Aucun strike/spot exploitable dans le chain à cette date."}
+
+ rows_b = get_snapshot_rows_asof(saxo_symbol, date_b)
+ if not rows_b:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"Pas d'historique Saxo au {date_b}."}
+ spot_b = next((r["spot"] for r in rows_b if r.get("spot") is not None), None)
+ if spot_b is None:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": "Spot manquant dans l'historique Saxo à la date de fin."}
+
+ # "As if we'd guessed the strike" — closest to where the underlying actually ended up.
+ chosen_strike = min(strikes_a, key=lambda k: abs(k - spot_b))
+
+ rows_a = get_snapshot_rows_asof(saxo_symbol, date_a)
+ d_a = datetime.strptime(date_a[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date()
+ d_b = datetime.strptime(date_b[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date()
+ d_exp = datetime.strptime(expiry_date[:10], "%Y-%m-%d").date()
+ elapsed_days = (d_b - d_a).days
+ days_to_expiry_a = (d_exp - d_a).days
+ days_to_expiry_b = (d_exp - d_b).days
+ expired_by_b = days_to_expiry_b <= 0
+
+ r = 0.05
+ legs_out: Dict[str, Any] = {}
+ for opt_type in ("call", "put"):
+ q_a = _leg_quote(rows_a, expiry_date, chosen_strike, opt_type)
+ if not q_a or q_a["mid"] <= 0 or q_a["iv"] is None:
+ legs_out[opt_type] = {"available": False}
+ continue
+
+ greeks_a = black_scholes(spot_a, chosen_strike, max(days_to_expiry_a, 1) / 365, r, q_a["iv"], opt_type)
+ intrinsic_a = max(0.0, spot_a - chosen_strike) if opt_type == "call" else max(0.0, chosen_strike - spot_a)
+ time_value_a = q_a["mid"] - intrinsic_a
+
+ if expired_by_b:
+ price_b = max(0.0, spot_b - chosen_strike) if opt_type == "call" else max(0.0, chosen_strike - spot_b)
+ iv_b, intrinsic_b, time_value_b = None, price_b, 0.0
+ else:
+ q_b = _leg_quote(rows_b, expiry_date, chosen_strike, opt_type)
+ if not q_b or q_b["mid"] <= 0:
+ legs_out[opt_type] = {"available": False}
+ continue
+ price_b, iv_b = q_b["mid"], q_b["iv"]
+ intrinsic_b = max(0.0, spot_b - chosen_strike) if opt_type == "call" else max(0.0, chosen_strike - spot_b)
+ time_value_b = price_b - intrinsic_b
+
+ actual_change = price_b - q_a["mid"]
+ delta_pnl = greeks_a["delta"] * (spot_b - spot_a)
+ theta_pnl = greeks_a["theta"] * elapsed_days
+ vega_pnl = greeks_a["vega"] * ((iv_b - q_a["iv"]) * 100) if iv_b is not None else 0.0
+ explained = delta_pnl + theta_pnl + vega_pnl
+
+ legs_out[opt_type] = {
+ "available": True,
+ "price_a": round(q_a["mid"], 4), "price_b": round(price_b, 4), "actual_change": round(actual_change, 4),
+ "iv_a": round(q_a["iv"], 4), "iv_b": round(iv_b, 4) if iv_b is not None else None,
+ "intrinsic_a": round(intrinsic_a, 4), "time_value_a": round(time_value_a, 4),
+ "intrinsic_b": round(intrinsic_b, 4), "time_value_b": round(time_value_b, 4),
+ "greeks_a": {k: greeks_a[k] for k in ("delta", "gamma", "theta", "vega")},
+ "attribution": {
+ "delta_pnl": round(delta_pnl, 4), "theta_pnl": round(theta_pnl, 4), "vega_pnl": round(vega_pnl, 4),
+ "explained": round(explained, 4), "residual": round(actual_change - explained, 4),
+ },
+ }
+
+ realized_vol = _realized_vol(ticker, date_a, date_b)
+ iv_a_ref = next((legs_out[t]["iv_a"] for t in ("call", "put") if legs_out.get(t, {}).get("available")), None)
+
+ return {
+ "available": True,
+ "ticker": ticker, "saxo_symbol": saxo_symbol,
+ "date_a": date_a, "date_b": date_b, "elapsed_days": elapsed_days,
+ "target_dte_used": target_dte,
+ "expiry_date": expiry_date, "expired_by_date_b": expired_by_b,
+ "spot_a": round(spot_a, 6), "spot_b": round(spot_b, 6),
+ "spot_change_pct": round((spot_b - spot_a) / spot_a * 100, 2) if spot_a else None,
+ "chosen_strike": chosen_strike,
+ "iv_a": iv_a_ref,
+ "realized_vol": round(realized_vol, 4) if realized_vol is not None else None,
+ "vol_risk_premium": (
+ round(iv_a_ref - realized_vol, 4) if (iv_a_ref is not None and realized_vol is not None) else None
+ ),
+ "legs": legs_out,
+ }
diff --git a/backend/services/strategy_comparison.py b/backend/services/strategy_comparison.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e08bee6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/backend/services/strategy_comparison.py
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+"""
+Retrospective "what would have been optimal" comparison for an existing Portfolio position
+— reuses the Strategy Builder optimizer (services.strategy_optimizer.optimize) against the
+REAL historical option chain reconstructed as of the position's entry_date
+(services.option_chain.get_chain_slice's `as_of` param, backed by
+services.database.get_snapshot_rows_asof — the accumulated Saxo snapshot history, not
+synthetic data), scored against the REALIZED spot/IV move between entry and the comparison
+date rather than a guessed scenario — it's not a forecast, it's what actually happened.
+
+Results are compared in PERCENTAGE terms (return on capital / return on risk), never raw
+dollars: Strategy Builder's own pricer (services.strategy_engine, contract_size configurable,
+FX-lot-style default 100_000) and Portfolio's pricer (services.portfolio_pricing, hardcoded
+qty*100 equity-option-style) use different contract-size conventions for historical reasons —
+comparing their dollar outputs directly would silently misstate the comparison by orders of
+magnitude (the exact class of bug this project hit before with the COMEX copper scale issue).
+A % return is convention-agnostic since the contract size cancels out of the ratio.
+"""
+from datetime import date, datetime
+from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
+
+
+def _reprice_actual_legs_pct(
+ legs: list, chain_entry: Dict[str, Any], surface_entry, surface_realized,
+ horizon_days: int, capital_invested: float, ib_fees_entry: float,
+) -> Optional[float]:
+ """% return of the position's REAL legs, priced at entry (services.portfolio_pricing's
+ own qty*100 convention — mirrored here, not imported, since that module's functions are
+ tied to "now" market data, not a historical `as_of` chain) then repriced under the
+ realized move. Returns None if the position has no legs to price."""
+ from services.options_pricer import black_scholes
+ from services.option_chain import find_quote
+
+ if not legs:
+ return None
+ r = 0.05
+ S_entry = chain_entry["spot"]
+ S_realized = surface_realized.spot
+ T_remaining = max(horizon_days, 0) / 365
+
+ pnl = -ib_fees_entry
+ for leg in legs:
+ K = leg.get("strike") or S_entry
+ opt_type = leg.get("option_type", "call")
+ qty = leg.get("quantity", 1)
+ sign = 1 if leg.get("position", "long") == "long" else -1
+ days_to_expiry = leg.get("days_to_expiry", 90)
+
+ entry_premium = leg.get("premium_paid")
+ if entry_premium is None:
+ quote = find_quote(chain_entry, leg.get("expiry_date", ""), K, opt_type)
+ if quote and quote.get("bid", 0) > 0 and quote.get("ask", 0) > 0:
+ entry_premium = quote["mid"]
+ else:
+ sigma_entry = surface_entry.iv_at(K, days_to_expiry)
+ entry_premium = black_scholes(S_entry, K, max(days_to_expiry, 1) / 365, r, sigma_entry, opt_type)["price"]
+
+ remaining = max(days_to_expiry - horizon_days, 0.001)
+ sigma_realized = surface_realized.iv_at(K, remaining)
+ realized_price = (
+ black_scholes(S_realized, K, remaining / 365, r, sigma_realized, opt_type)["price"]
+ if T_remaining > 0 and remaining > 0.001
+ else (max(0.0, S_realized - K) if opt_type == "call" else max(0.0, K - S_realized))
+ )
+ pnl += sign * qty * 100 * (realized_price - entry_premium)
+
+ if not capital_invested:
+ return None
+ return round(pnl / capital_invested * 100, 2)
+
+
+def compute_retrospective_comparison(pos: Dict[str, Any], as_of: Optional[str] = None) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+ from services.database import get_saxo_option_symbol_for_ticker
+ from services.option_chain import get_chain_slice
+ from services.vol_surface import build_surface, apply_scenario
+ from services.strategy_optimizer import optimize as run_optimizer
+
+ underlying = pos["underlying"]
+ saxo_symbol = get_saxo_option_symbol_for_ticker(underlying)
+ if not saxo_symbol:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"'{underlying}' n'est pas lié à un chain Saxo (Config → Instruments Watchlist)."}
+
+ entry_date = pos["entry_date"][:10]
+ as_of_date = (as_of or pos.get("close_date") or date.today().isoformat())[:10]
+ if as_of_date <= entry_date:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": "La date de comparaison doit être postérieure à la date d'entrée."}
+
+ horizon_days = (
+ datetime.strptime(as_of_date, "%Y-%m-%d").date() - datetime.strptime(entry_date, "%Y-%m-%d").date()
+ ).days
+ target_days_entry = pos.get("expiry_days", 90)
+
+ try:
+ chain_entry = get_chain_slice(saxo_symbol, target_days=target_days_entry, n_expiries=3, as_of=entry_date)
+ except ValueError as e:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"Pas d'historique Saxo à la date d'entrée ({entry_date}) : {e}"}
+ try:
+ chain_realized = get_chain_slice(
+ saxo_symbol, target_days=max(target_days_entry - horizon_days, 1), n_expiries=3,
+ as_of=as_of_date if as_of else None,
+ )
+ except ValueError as e:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": f"Pas d'historique Saxo à la date de comparaison ({as_of_date}) : {e}"}
+
+ surface_entry = build_surface(chain_entry)
+ surface_realized_base = build_surface(chain_realized)
+
+ spot_entry = chain_entry["spot"]
+ spot_realized = chain_realized["spot"]
+ if not spot_entry or not spot_realized:
+ return {"available": False, "reason": "Spot manquant dans l'historique Saxo à l'une des deux dates."}
+
+ realized_spot_shock_pct = round((spot_realized - spot_entry) / spot_entry * 100, 2)
+ iv_entry = surface_entry.iv_at(spot_entry, target_days_entry)
+ iv_realized = surface_realized_base.iv_at(spot_realized, max(target_days_entry - horizon_days, 1))
+ realized_iv_shift = round(iv_realized - iv_entry, 4)
+
+ # The same realized shock, applied on top of the ENTRY surface — puts the "actual
+ # position" and "optimal candidates" repricing on the exact same footing (both start
+ # from what was really quoted at entry, both move by what really happened afterwards).
+ surface_realized = apply_scenario(surface_entry, spot_shock_pct=realized_spot_shock_pct, iv_level_shift=realized_iv_shift)
+
+ actual_return_pct = _reprice_actual_legs_pct(
+ pos.get("legs", []), chain_entry, surface_entry, surface_realized,
+ horizon_days, pos.get("capital_invested") or 0, pos.get("ib_fees_entry", 0),
+ )
+
+ optimal_candidates = run_optimizer(
+ symbol=saxo_symbol, horizon_days=horizon_days,
+ spot_shock_pct=realized_spot_shock_pct, iv_level_shift=realized_iv_shift,
+ skew_tilt=0.0, term_slope_shift=0.0, manual_grid=None, n_expiries=3, rate=0.05,
+ constraints={"max_legs": 4, "delta_threshold": None, "max_loss_cap": None},
+ objective="net_pnl", top_n=5, as_of=entry_date,
+ )
+
+ # NOT "return on max_loss": check_bounded_risk's worst-case search is unreliable for
+ # multi-expiry (calendar/diagonal) structures — the far leg is still alive and vol-
+ # dependent at the near leg's expiry, so its "max loss" can come out implausibly small
+ # regardless of precise=True/False, producing a nonsense ratio (verified empirically:
+ # >9000% "return on risk" on a diagonal in testing). Comparing against the SAME capital
+ # basis as the actual position (capital_invested) sidesteps that search entirely — "if
+ # you'd put the same money into this instead" is also a more direct answer to "what
+ # should I have done" than a max-loss ratio would be. Repriced at contract_size=100 to
+ # match Portfolio's own per-contract convention (see module docstring) rather than
+ # Strategy Builder's default FX-lot size, so the dollar P&L this produces is actually on
+ # the same footing as capital_invested, not just a same-shaped ratio.
+ from services.strategy_engine import price_combo
+ capital = pos.get("capital_invested") or 0
+ for c in optimal_candidates:
+ try:
+ precise = price_combo(
+ c["legs"], chain_entry, surface_entry, surface_realized, horizon_days,
+ r=0.05, contract_size=100, precise=True,
+ )
+ c["net_pnl"], c["max_gain"], c["max_loss"] = precise["net_pnl"], precise["max_gain"], precise["max_loss"]
+ c["net_delta_now"] = precise["net_delta_now"]
+ c["return_on_capital_pct"] = round(precise["net_pnl"] / capital * 100, 2) if capital else None
+ except Exception:
+ c["return_on_capital_pct"] = None
+
+ return {
+ "available": True,
+ "underlying": underlying, "saxo_symbol": saxo_symbol,
+ "entry_date": entry_date, "as_of": as_of_date, "horizon_days": horizon_days,
+ "spot_entry": round(spot_entry, 6), "spot_realized": round(spot_realized, 6),
+ "realized_spot_shock_pct": realized_spot_shock_pct,
+ "iv_entry": round(iv_entry, 4), "iv_realized": round(iv_realized, 4), "realized_iv_shift": realized_iv_shift,
+ "actual_return_pct": actual_return_pct,
+ "optimal_candidates": optimal_candidates,
+ }
diff --git a/backend/services/strategy_engine.py b/backend/services/strategy_engine.py
index 3b383dc..152c28b 100644
--- a/backend/services/strategy_engine.py
+++ b/backend/services/strategy_engine.py
@@ -81,7 +81,10 @@ def value_at(
r: float,
contract_size: float = DEFAULT_CONTRACT_SIZE,
) -> float:
- """Signed portfolio value (BS reprice for unexpired legs, intrinsic for expired ones)."""
+ """Signed portfolio value (BS reprice for unexpired legs, intrinsic for expired ones).
+ check_bounded_risk calls this ~700 times per candidate it evaluates — second-order
+ Greeks are never read here, so they're skipped (include_second_order=False) rather than
+ computed and discarded on every one of those calls."""
total = 0.0
for leg in legs:
remaining = leg["days_to_expiry"] - eval_days_from_now
@@ -91,7 +94,7 @@ def value_at(
price = _intrinsic(S, leg["strike"], leg["option_type"])
else:
sigma = surface.iv_at(leg["strike"], remaining)
- price = black_scholes(S, leg["strike"], remaining / 365, r, sigma, leg["option_type"])["price"]
+ price = black_scholes(S, leg["strike"], remaining / 365, r, sigma, leg["option_type"], include_second_order=False)["price"]
total += sign * price * qty * contract_size
return total
diff --git a/backend/services/strategy_optimizer.py b/backend/services/strategy_optimizer.py
index 5734253..806ed81 100644
--- a/backend/services/strategy_optimizer.py
+++ b/backend/services/strategy_optimizer.py
@@ -273,9 +273,10 @@ def optimize(
dte_min: Optional[int] = None,
dte_max: Optional[int] = None,
greek_profile: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None,
+ as_of: Optional[str] = None,
) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
r = rate + rate_shock_bps / 10000.0
- chain_slice = get_chain_slice(symbol, horizon_days, n_expiries, dte_min=dte_min, dte_max=dte_max)
+ chain_slice = get_chain_slice(symbol, horizon_days, n_expiries, dte_min=dte_min, dte_max=dte_max, as_of=as_of)
surface_now = build_surface(chain_slice)
surface_scenario = apply_scenario(
surface_now, spot_shock_pct=spot_shock_pct, iv_level_shift=iv_level_shift,
diff --git a/frontend/src/hooks/useApi.ts b/frontend/src/hooks/useApi.ts
index 62f627b..5162897 100644
--- a/frontend/src/hooks/useApi.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/hooks/useApi.ts
@@ -326,6 +326,31 @@ export const usePositionPayoff = (posId: string, enabled: boolean) =>
enabled,
})
+// "What would have been optimal, in hindsight?" — reprices the position's real legs and
+// runs the Strategy Builder optimizer against the REAL historical Saxo chain + the REALIZED
+// spot/IV move since entry (not a guessed scenario). Expensive (full optimizer run), so
+// on-demand only — not auto-fetched, call refetch() from a button.
+export type RetrospectiveCandidate = {
+ template_name: string; legs: StrategyLeg[]; score: number; return_on_capital_pct: number | null
+ net_pnl: number; max_gain: number | null; max_loss: number | null; net_delta_now: number
+}
+export type RetrospectiveComparison = {
+ available: boolean; reason?: string
+ underlying?: string; entry_date?: string; as_of?: string; horizon_days?: number
+ spot_entry?: number; spot_realized?: number; realized_spot_shock_pct?: number
+ iv_entry?: number; iv_realized?: number; realized_iv_shift?: number
+ actual_return_pct?: number | null
+ optimal_candidates?: RetrospectiveCandidate[]
+}
+
+export const useRetrospectiveOptimal = (posId: string, asOf?: string) =>
+ useQuery({
+ queryKey: ['portfolio-retrospective-optimal', posId, asOf],
+ queryFn: () => api.get(`/portfolio/positions/${posId}/retrospective-optimal`, { params: asOf ? { as_of: asOf } : {} }).then(r => r.data),
+ enabled: false,
+ staleTime: 5 * 60_000,
+ })
+
// Reprices every open position under a handful of named macro scenarios (Risk-Off,
// Risk-On, inflation persistante, dollar fort, baisse des matières premières) to surface
// when several differently-named positions are really the same underlying bet.
@@ -1048,6 +1073,36 @@ export const useSaxoIvSnapshot = (symbol: string) =>
staleTime: 5 * 60_000,
})
+// Options Lab — "was this option well priced between two dates?" Picks the strike closest
+// to the underlying's realized outcome at date_b (hindsight), reprices at both dates from
+// real Saxo history, decomposes the move into Delta/Theta/Vega + a residual.
+export type PricingCheckLeg = {
+ available: boolean
+ price_a?: number; price_b?: number; actual_change?: number
+ iv_a?: number | null; iv_b?: number | null
+ intrinsic_a?: number; time_value_a?: number; intrinsic_b?: number; time_value_b?: number
+ greeks_a?: { delta: number; gamma: number; theta: number; vega: number }
+ attribution?: { delta_pnl: number; theta_pnl: number; vega_pnl: number; explained: number; residual: number }
+}
+export type PricingCheckResult = {
+ available: boolean; reason?: string
+ ticker?: string; date_a?: string; date_b?: string; elapsed_days?: number; target_dte_used?: number
+ expiry_date?: string; expired_by_date_b?: boolean
+ spot_a?: number; spot_b?: number; spot_change_pct?: number; chosen_strike?: number
+ iv_a?: number | null; realized_vol?: number | null; vol_risk_premium?: number | null
+ legs?: { call: PricingCheckLeg; put: PricingCheckLeg }
+}
+
+// targetDte omitted/undefined -> backend defaults to the expiry closest to dateB (hindsight,
+// same principle as the strike selection) — only pass it to force a different expiry.
+export const usePricingCheck = (ticker: string, dateA: string, dateB: string, targetDte: number | undefined, enabled: boolean) =>
+ useQuery({
+ queryKey: ['options-pricing-check', ticker, dateA, dateB, targetDte],
+ queryFn: () => api.get('/saxo/pricing-check', { params: { ticker, date_a: dateA, date_b: dateB, target_dte: targetDte } }).then(r => r.data),
+ enabled: enabled && !!ticker && !!dateA && !!dateB,
+ staleTime: 5 * 60_000,
+ })
+
export const useSaxoIvHistory = (symbol: string, days = 90) =>
useQuery({
queryKey: ['saxo-iv-history', symbol, days],
diff --git a/frontend/src/pages/OptionsLab.tsx b/frontend/src/pages/OptionsLab.tsx
index 1abbdf9..f300b72 100644
--- a/frontend/src/pages/OptionsLab.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/pages/OptionsLab.tsx
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
import { useState } from 'react'
import {
useIvWatchlist, useIvSnapshot, useIvHistory, useWatchlistTickers, useAddWatchlistTicker, useRemoveWatchlistTicker,
- useSaxoIvWatchlist, useSaxoIvSnapshot, useSaxoIvHistory, useInstrumentsWatchlist,
+ useSaxoIvWatchlist, useSaxoIvSnapshot, useSaxoIvHistory, useInstrumentsWatchlist, usePricingCheck,
} from '../hooks/useApi'
-import { Activity, TrendingUp, TrendingDown, Minus, RefreshCw, ChevronDown, ChevronUp, Database, Plus, Trash2, List, Link2 } from 'lucide-react'
+import { Activity, TrendingUp, TrendingDown, Minus, RefreshCw, ChevronDown, ChevronUp, Database, Plus, Trash2, List, Link2, Search } from 'lucide-react'
import { api } from '../hooks/useApi'
import { useQueryClient } from '@tanstack/react-query'
import clsx from 'clsx'
@@ -528,6 +528,175 @@ function WatchlistManager() {
)
}
+// ── Pricing check — "était-ce bien pricé entre 2 dates ?" ───────────────────────
+function fmtSigned(v: number | null | undefined, digits = 2): string {
+ if (v == null) return '—'
+ return `${v >= 0 ? '+' : ''}${v.toFixed(digits)}`
+}
+
+function PricingCheckLegCard({ label, leg }: { label: string; leg: any }) {
+ if (!leg?.available) {
+ return (
+
+
{label}
+
Pas de cotation exploitable pour cette jambe.
+
+ )
+ }
+ const attr = leg.attribution
+ return (
+
+
+
{label}
+
= 0 ? 'text-emerald-400' : 'text-red-400')}>
+ {fmtSigned(leg.actual_change, 4)}
+
+
+
+
Prix
+
{leg.price_a?.toFixed(4)} → {leg.price_b?.toFixed(4)}
+
IV
+
+ {leg.iv_a != null ? `${(leg.iv_a * 100).toFixed(1)}%` : '—'} → {leg.iv_b != null ? `${(leg.iv_b * 100).toFixed(1)}%` : 'expiré'}
+
+
Intrinsèque
+
{leg.intrinsic_a?.toFixed(2)} → {leg.intrinsic_b?.toFixed(2)}
+
Valeur temps
+
{leg.time_value_a?.toFixed(2)} → {leg.time_value_b?.toFixed(2)}
+
+ {attr && (
+
+
Décomposition (Greeks à la date A)
+
+
Δ spot × Delta {fmtSigned(attr.delta_pnl)}
+
Temps × Theta {fmtSigned(attr.theta_pnl)}
+
Δ IV × Vega {fmtSigned(attr.vega_pnl)}
+
+ Expliqué par les Greeks {fmtSigned(attr.explained)}
+
+
+ Résidu (gamma, skew, anomalie…)
+ Math.abs(leg.actual_change) * 0.3 ? 'text-amber-400' : 'text-slate-200')}>
+ {fmtSigned(attr.residual)}
+
+
+
+
+ )}
+
+ )
+}
+
+function PricingCheckPanel() {
+ const { data: watchlistInstruments } = useInstrumentsWatchlist()
+ const tickers: any[] = (watchlistInstruments as any[]) ?? []
+ const [ticker, setTicker] = useState('')
+ const [dateA, setDateA] = useState('')
+ const [dateB, setDateB] = useState('')
+ const [targetDte, setTargetDte] = useState(undefined)
+ const [run, setRun] = useState(false)
+
+ const { data, isFetching, refetch } = usePricingCheck(ticker, dateA, dateB, targetDte, run)
+
+ const handleAnalyze = () => {
+ setRun(true)
+ refetch()
+ }
+
+ return (
+
+
+
+ Vérification de pricing historique
+
+
+ Choisit, avec le recul, le strike le plus proche de là où le sous-jacent a réellement fini — le contrat le
+ plus révélateur pour juger si la volatilité était bien pricée à la date de départ. Repricing réel depuis
+ l'historique Saxo accumulé, décomposé Delta/Theta/Vega.
+
+
+
+ Instrument
+ setTicker(e.target.value)}
+ className="w-full bg-dark-700 border border-slate-700/50 rounded px-2 py-1.5 text-slate-200">
+ —
+ {tickers.map(t => {t.name || t.ticker} )}
+
+
+
+ Date A (départ)
+ setDateA(e.target.value)}
+ className="w-full bg-dark-700 border border-slate-700/50 rounded px-2 py-1.5 text-slate-200" />
+
+
+ Date B (fin)
+ setDateB(e.target.value)}
+ className="w-full bg-dark-700 border border-slate-700/50 rounded px-2 py-1.5 text-slate-200" />
+
+
+
+ DTE cible (optionnel)
+
+ setTargetDte(e.target.value === '' ? undefined : parseInt(e.target.value))}
+ className="w-full bg-dark-700 border border-slate-700/50 rounded px-2 py-1.5 text-slate-200" />
+
+
+
+ {isFetching ? 'Analyse…' : 'Analyser'}
+
+
+
+ {data && !data.available && (
+
{data.reason}
+ )}
+
+ {data?.available && (
+ <>
+
+
+
Spot
+
{data.spot_a?.toFixed(2)} → {data.spot_b?.toFixed(2)}
+
= 0 ? 'text-emerald-400' : 'text-red-400')}>
+ {fmtSigned(data.spot_change_pct)}%
+
+
+
+
Strike choisi (recul)
+
{data.chosen_strike}
+
+ échéance {data.expiry_date}{data.expired_by_date_b ? ' (expirée)' : ''} · {data.target_dte_used}j visés
+
+
+
+
IV (départ) vs Vol réalisée
+
+ {data.iv_a != null ? `${(data.iv_a * 100).toFixed(1)}%` : '—'} / {data.realized_vol != null ? `${(data.realized_vol * 100).toFixed(1)}%` : '—'}
+
+
+
+
Prime de risque de vol
+
= 0 ? 'text-emerald-400' : 'text-red-400')}>
+ {data.vol_risk_premium != null ? `${fmtSigned(data.vol_risk_premium * 100, 1)}pts` : '—'}
+
+
{(data.vol_risk_premium ?? 0) >= 0 ? 'IV a surpayé la vol réalisée' : 'IV a sous-payé la vol réalisée'}
+
+
+
+
+ >
+ )}
+
+ )
+}
+
// ── Main page ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
export default function OptionsLab() {
// yfinance-based IV watchlist — disabled per user request (2026-07-21): Options Lab
@@ -562,6 +731,7 @@ export default function OptionsLab() {
// // Show bootstrap banner if most items have no meaningful IV Rank (stuck at 50 or null)
// const needsBootstrap = items.length > 0 && items.filter(i => i.iv_rank == null || i.iv_rank === 50).length > items.length * 0.6
+ const [activeTab, setActiveTab] = useState<'iv-rank' | 'pricing-check'>('iv-rank')
const { data: saxoData, isLoading: saxoLoading, refetch: refetchSaxo, isFetching: saxoFetching } = useSaxoIvWatchlist()
const { data: watchlistInstruments } = useInstrumentsWatchlist()
// Cross-reference the Saxo IV watchlist (keyed by Saxo option symbol, e.g. "MCLU6")
@@ -608,8 +778,28 @@ export default function OptionsLab() {
Saxo broker data · IV Rank · Term Structure · Skew
+
+ setActiveTab('iv-rank')}
+ className={clsx('px-3 py-1.5 rounded text-xs font-semibold transition-colors', {
+ 'bg-blue-600 text-white': activeTab === 'iv-rank',
+ 'text-slate-400 hover:text-slate-200': activeTab !== 'iv-rank',
+ })}>
+ IV Rank
+
+ setActiveTab('pricing-check')}
+ className={clsx('px-3 py-1.5 rounded text-xs font-semibold transition-colors', {
+ 'bg-blue-600 text-white': activeTab === 'pricing-check',
+ 'text-slate-400 hover:text-slate-200': activeTab !== 'pricing-check',
+ })}>
+ Vérification de pricing
+
+
+ {activeTab === 'pricing-check' && }
+
+ {activeTab === 'iv-rank' && (
+ <>
{/* Légende */}
@@ -729,6 +919,8 @@ export default function OptionsLab() {
{/* yfinance IV Watchlist Manager — disabled along with the section above.
*/}
+ >
+ )}
)
}
diff --git a/frontend/src/pages/Portfolio.tsx b/frontend/src/pages/Portfolio.tsx
index 930c401..c41cfb5 100644
--- a/frontend/src/pages/Portfolio.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/pages/Portfolio.tsx
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { useState } from 'react'
import { useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'
import {
usePortfolioPositions, usePortfolioSummary, usePnlHistory,
- useAddPosition, useClosePosition, usePositionPayoff
+ useAddPosition, useClosePosition, usePositionPayoff, useRetrospectiveOptimal
} from '../hooks/useApi'
import { useQueryClient, useMutation } from '@tanstack/react-query'
import axios from 'axios'
@@ -263,6 +263,91 @@ function PositionPayoffChart({ posId, enabled, legs }: { posId: string; enabled:
)
}
+function RetrospectiveComparisonCard({ posId, enabled }: { posId: string; enabled: boolean }) {
+ const { data, isFetching, refetch, isFetched } = useRetrospectiveOptimal(posId)
+ if (!enabled) return null
+
+ return (
+
+
+
+ Comparaison rétrospective — qu'aurait-il fallu faire ?
+
+ refetch()}
+ disabled={isFetching}
+ className="text-[10px] bg-blue-600/80 hover:bg-blue-500 disabled:opacity-50 text-white px-2 py-1 rounded font-semibold"
+ >
+ {isFetching ? 'Calcul… (~1 min)' : isFetched ? 'Recalculer' : 'Calculer'}
+
+
+
+ {!isFetched && !isFetching && (
+
+ Reconstruit le chain Saxo réel à la date d'entrée et le compare au mouvement réellement survenu depuis —
+ pas un scénario deviné. Fait tourner l'optimiseur complet (~1 min), calculé à la demande.
+
+ )}
+ {isFetching && (
+
Recherche parmi les stratégies possibles à la date d'entrée…
+ )}
+
+ {data && !data.available && (
+
{data.reason}
+ )}
+
+ {data?.available && (
+
+
+ Du {data.entry_date} au {data.as_of} ({data.horizon_days}j) — mouvement réel :{' '}
+ = 0 ? 'text-emerald-400' : 'text-red-400')}>
+ spot {(data.realized_spot_shock_pct ?? 0) >= 0 ? '+' : ''}{data.realized_spot_shock_pct}%
+
+ {', '}
+
+ IV {(data.realized_iv_shift ?? 0) >= 0 ? '+' : ''}{((data.realized_iv_shift ?? 0) * 100).toFixed(1)}pts
+
+
+
+
+
+ Votre position :
+ = 0 ? 'text-emerald-400' : 'text-red-400')}>
+ {data.actual_return_pct != null ? `${data.actual_return_pct >= 0 ? '+' : ''}${data.actual_return_pct}%` : '—'}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Structure optimale (rétrospective)
+ Retour sur même capital
+ Δ net
+
+
+
+ {(data.optimal_candidates ?? []).map((c, i) => (
+
+ {c.template_name}
+
+ {c.return_on_capital_pct != null ? `${c.return_on_capital_pct >= 0 ? '+' : ''}${c.return_on_capital_pct}%` : '—'}
+
+ {c.net_delta_now.toFixed(3)}
+
+ ))}
+
+
+
+ Comparaison en % du même capital investi que votre position réelle — pas en dollars bruts, les deux
+ moteurs de pricing (Portfolio et Strategy Builder) n'utilisent pas la même convention de taille de contrat.
+
+
+ )}
+
+ )
+}
+
function PositionCard({ pos }: { pos: Record
}) {
const navigate = useNavigate()
const [showClose, setShowClose] = useState(false)
@@ -447,6 +532,7 @@ function PositionCard({ pos }: { pos: Record }) {
+
)}