# GL-001 Open Points

## Mapping questions

| ID | Question | Area | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GL001-Q001 | Q: In Tryton / Tradon mapping, should `document_number` be `account.move.number`, `account.move.post_number`, invoice `number`, or a context-dependent value? | Document references | Open |
| GL001-Q002 | Q: Should `journal_entry_number` be `move.number` and `document_number` be the business document number? | Document references | Open |
| GL001-Q003 | Q: Is `voucher_number` distinct in Tradon, or should it remain blank? | Document references | Open |
| GL001-Q004 | Q: Should `transaction_currency` default to company currency when `second_currency` is empty? | Currency | Open |
| GL001-Q005 | Q: Should credit columns be exported as negative values to match the target GL, even though Tryton UI displays credit as positive? | Sign convention | Open |
| GL001-Q006 | Q: Which origin models should feed `document_date` and `document_type` in the first implementation? | Source document metadata | Open |
| GL001-Q007 | Q: Can `payable_qty` and `uom` be derived reliably from `account.move.line.lot`, fees or invoice line origin for all commodity postings? | Commodity fields | Open |
| GL001-Q014 | Q: Which source, rate date, direct/inverse convention and precision should be used for `Currency_Rate`? | FX rate | Open |
| GL001-Q015 | Q: Should `Currency_Rate` keep its current report-specific capitalization or be harmonized to `currency_rate` with the wider field naming convention? | Field naming | Open |

## Implementation questions

| ID | Question | Area | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GL001-Q008 | Q: Should GL-001 be implemented as a new flat reporting dataset rather than extending the standard Tryton General Ledger views? | Dataset design | Open |
| GL001-Q009 | Q: Should transaction-currency opening and closing balances be calculated in the reporting layer or stored in an intermediate model? | Currency balances | Open |
| GL001-Q010 | Q: Should document and source reference mappings be generic across all accounting reports or specific to GL-001 first? | Shared mappings | Open |

## Business arbitration points

| ID | Question | Area | Status |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| GL001-Q011 | Q: Is multi-entity selection required, or is the current company context sufficient for the first GL-001 implementation? | Entity | Open |
| GL001-Q012 | Q: Should AP-specific fields such as `supplier_invoice_number` be mandatory only when the source is an AP invoice? | Audit trail | Open |
| GL001-Q013 | Q: Are `payable_qty` and `uom` mandatory for GL-001 launch, or can they remain low-priority commodity extensions? | Scope | Open |