Add Tradon development backlog workflow
This commit is contained in:
21
AGENT.md
21
AGENT.md
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ When documents conflict, use this order of authority:
|
||||
5. Catalog scope in `Docs/reporting_catalog.md`.
|
||||
6. Conceptual background in `Docs/CTRM_ACCOUNTING_REPORTING_ARCHITECTURE.md`.
|
||||
7. Source workbook `Docs/Trad On - Rapports Comptables et Financiers.xlsx`.
|
||||
8. Incoming GAP analysis files in `Tradon/`, after they have been copied into the relevant assessment `source_documents/` folder.
|
||||
|
||||
If a conflict remains unclear, document it as an open question instead of silently choosing a business rule.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +138,26 @@ When asked to review existing specifications:
|
||||
4. Identify duplicated or conflicting concepts.
|
||||
5. Propose or apply focused corrections.
|
||||
|
||||
When asked to create or refresh a Tradon assessment:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Identify the incoming GAP analysis file in `Tradon/`.
|
||||
2. Copy the relevant source file into `Assessments/Tradon/<REPORT_CODE>/source_documents/`.
|
||||
3. Record the intake source and retained assessment copy in `source_material.md`.
|
||||
4. Keep the target report specification in `Reports/` as the functional reference.
|
||||
5. Capture exposure notes, gap mapping, open points and decisions in the assessment folder.
|
||||
6. Do not rewrite the target report silently from the GAP analysis; explicit decisions are required.
|
||||
7. Write new framing questions in the relevant document using `Q: `, optional `C: ` comments, optional `PROPOSITION: ` proposals and `R: ` user responses.
|
||||
|
||||
When asked to prepare development backlog items from gaps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Start from the relevant `Assessments/Tradon/<REPORT_CODE>/gap_mapping.md`.
|
||||
2. Link each backlog item to stable gap themes, open points and pending decisions.
|
||||
3. Keep items atomic enough to be implemented and tested.
|
||||
4. Include acceptance criteria and expected validation controls.
|
||||
5. Mark items blocked when a business or mapping decision is still open.
|
||||
6. Do not invent source tables, joins or implementation design beyond what the assessment evidence supports.
|
||||
7. Prefer linking backlog dependencies to pending decisions (`PD`) rather than directly to open questions (`Q`) once a decision wrapper exists.
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
The assistant should not:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,6 +2,18 @@
|
||||
|
||||
This file records decisions taken after reviewing the GL-001 exposure to Tryton / Tradon.
|
||||
|
||||
## Development readiness rule
|
||||
|
||||
A development backlog item can move from `Blocked` to `Ready` only when all linked pending decisions are `Confirmed`.
|
||||
|
||||
A decision is `Confirmed` when it has:
|
||||
|
||||
- a selected option or explicit arbitration;
|
||||
- a rationale;
|
||||
- an impact statement;
|
||||
- linked backlog items;
|
||||
- a validation or review expectation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision log
|
||||
|
||||
| Date | ID | Decision | Rationale | Impact | Status |
|
||||
@@ -18,3 +30,146 @@ This file records decisions taken after reviewing the GL-001 exposure to Tryton
|
||||
| GL001-PD004 | Decide which source origin models feed `document_date`, `document_type` and supplier invoice references. | GL001-Q006, GL001-Q012 | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-PD005 | Decide whether commodity fields `payable_qty` and `uom` are required in the first implementation. | GL001-Q007, GL001-Q013 | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-PD006 | Decide whether GL-001 requires a new flat reporting dataset. | GL001-Q008 | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-PD007 | Decide whether audit and source reference mappings are generic across accounting reports or specific to GL-001 first. | GL001-Q010 | Open |
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision details
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD001 Document reference mapping
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q001, GL001-Q002, GL001-Q003
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-004
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD002 Transaction-currency fallback
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q004
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-002, DEV-GL001-006
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD003 GL sign convention transformation
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q005
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-007
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD004 Source document metadata
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q006, GL001-Q012
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-005
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD005 Commodity quantity fields
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q007, GL001-Q013
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-010
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD006 Flat GL-001 dataset
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q008
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-001, DEV-GL001-003, DEV-GL001-009
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
### GL001-PD007 Shared audit and reference mapping scope
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
|
||||
Linked open points: GL001-Q010
|
||||
|
||||
Impacted backlog items: DEV-GL001-008
|
||||
|
||||
Decision:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Impact:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
Validation expectation:
|
||||
TBD
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,26 +4,26 @@
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Question | Area | Status |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| GL001-Q001 | In Tryton / Tradon mapping, should `document_number` be `account.move.number`, `account.move.post_number`, invoice `number`, or a context-dependent value? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q002 | Should `journal_entry_number` be `move.number` and `document_number` be the business document number? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q003 | Is `voucher_number` distinct in Tradon, or should it remain blank? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q004 | Should `transaction_currency` default to company currency when `second_currency` is empty? | Currency | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q005 | Should credit columns be exported as negative values to match the target GL, even though Tryton UI displays credit as positive? | Sign convention | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q006 | Which origin models should feed `document_date` and `document_type` in the first implementation? | Source document metadata | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q007 | Can `payable_qty` and `uom` be derived reliably from `account.move.line.lot`, fees or invoice line origin for all commodity postings? | Commodity fields | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q001 | Q: In Tryton / Tradon mapping, should `document_number` be `account.move.number`, `account.move.post_number`, invoice `number`, or a context-dependent value? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q002 | Q: Should `journal_entry_number` be `move.number` and `document_number` be the business document number? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q003 | Q: Is `voucher_number` distinct in Tradon, or should it remain blank? | Document references | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q004 | Q: Should `transaction_currency` default to company currency when `second_currency` is empty? | Currency | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q005 | Q: Should credit columns be exported as negative values to match the target GL, even though Tryton UI displays credit as positive? | Sign convention | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q006 | Q: Which origin models should feed `document_date` and `document_type` in the first implementation? | Source document metadata | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q007 | Q: Can `payable_qty` and `uom` be derived reliably from `account.move.line.lot`, fees or invoice line origin for all commodity postings? | Commodity fields | Open |
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation questions
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Question | Area | Status |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| GL001-Q008 | Should GL-001 be implemented as a new flat reporting dataset rather than extending the standard Tryton General Ledger views? | Dataset design | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q009 | Should transaction-currency opening and closing balances be calculated in the reporting layer or stored in an intermediate model? | Currency balances | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q010 | Should document and source reference mappings be generic across all accounting reports or specific to GL-001 first? | Shared mappings | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q008 | Q: Should GL-001 be implemented as a new flat reporting dataset rather than extending the standard Tryton General Ledger views? | Dataset design | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q009 | Q: Should transaction-currency opening and closing balances be calculated in the reporting layer or stored in an intermediate model? | Currency balances | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q010 | Q: Should document and source reference mappings be generic across all accounting reports or specific to GL-001 first? | Shared mappings | Open |
|
||||
|
||||
## Business arbitration points
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Question | Area | Status |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| GL001-Q011 | Is multi-entity selection required, or is the current company context sufficient for the first GL-001 implementation? | Entity | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q012 | Should AP-specific fields such as `supplier_invoice_number` be mandatory only when the source is an AP invoice? | Audit trail | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q013 | Are `payable_qty` and `uom` mandatory for GL-001 launch, or can they remain low-priority commodity extensions? | Scope | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q011 | Q: Is multi-entity selection required, or is the current company context sufficient for the first GL-001 implementation? | Entity | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q012 | Q: Should AP-specific fields such as `supplier_invoice_number` be mandatory only when the source is an AP invoice? | Audit trail | Open |
|
||||
| GL001-Q013 | Q: Are `payable_qty` and `uom` mandatory for GL-001 launch, or can they remain low-priority commodity extensions? | Scope | Open |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -54,6 +54,28 @@ The assessment process does not change after intake: use the copied repository s
|
||||
| `decisions.md` | Decisions and arbitrations taken after review |
|
||||
| `source_material.md` | Source documents, date, scope and traceability notes |
|
||||
|
||||
## Open question notation
|
||||
|
||||
Open questions must be written in the relevant assessment document, except when the user explicitly asks to handle them elsewhere.
|
||||
|
||||
Use these prefixes:
|
||||
|
||||
| Prefix | Meaning |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `Q: ` | Open question requiring user, business or technical arbitration |
|
||||
| `C: ` | Comment that clarifies the open question, context or constraint |
|
||||
| `PROPOSITION: ` | Accounting-compatible proposal suggested for arbitration |
|
||||
| `R: ` | User response or confirmed answer |
|
||||
|
||||
After a document review, any new framing question should be added to the document using the same notation, unless an explicit exception is requested.
|
||||
|
||||
Expected file usage:
|
||||
|
||||
- `open_points.md` is the register of open questions. It should contain the `Q: ` entries and, when useful, related `C: ` comments or `PROPOSITION: ` proposals.
|
||||
- `decisions.md` is the register of answers and arbitrations. It should contain the user's `R: ` responses, the selected decision, rationale, impact and validation expectation.
|
||||
- A question may remain `Open` in `open_points.md` until the linked decision in `decisions.md` is confirmed.
|
||||
- When a decision is confirmed, update the linked backlog items according to the development readiness rule.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended statuses
|
||||
|
||||
| Status | Meaning |
|
||||
|
||||
321
DevelopmentBacklog/Tradon/GL_001_backlog.md
Normal file
321
DevelopmentBacklog/Tradon/GL_001_backlog.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,321 @@
|
||||
# GL-001 Tradon Development Backlog
|
||||
|
||||
Disposable draft created from `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/`.
|
||||
|
||||
This file is a working conversion layer between the documented GL-001 gaps and future development tickets. It is intentionally conservative: items remain `Blocked` where mapping, business or architecture decisions are still open.
|
||||
|
||||
## Traceability sources
|
||||
|
||||
| Type | Reference |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Target report | `Reports/GL/GL_001_general_ledger.md` |
|
||||
| Assessment | `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/` |
|
||||
| Gap mapping | `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/gap_mapping.md` |
|
||||
| Open points | `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/open_points.md` |
|
||||
| Decisions | `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/decisions.md` |
|
||||
| Retained source | `Assessments/Tradon/GL_001/source_documents/general_ledger_gap_analysis.md` |
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Priority | Status | Theme | Depends on |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-001 | High | Blocked | Flat detailed GL dataset | GL001-PD006 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-002 | High | Blocked | Transaction-currency grouping and balances | GL001-PD002, GL001-Q009 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-003 | High | Blocked | Opening and closing rows | GL001-PD006, GL001-Q009 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-004 | High | Blocked | Document and reference mapping | GL001-PD001 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-005 | High | Blocked | Source document metadata | GL001-PD004 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-006 | Medium | Blocked | Transaction-currency debit and credit split | GL001-PD002 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-007 | Medium | Blocked | GL sign convention transformation | GL001-PD003 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-008 | Medium | Blocked | Audit metadata columns | GL001-PD007 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-009 | Medium | Blocked | CSV and XLSX export | DEV-GL001-001 |
|
||||
| DEV-GL001-010 | Low | Blocked | Commodity quantity fields | GL001-PD005 |
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-001 Flat detailed GL dataset
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Build or expose a flat detailed GL dataset matching `GL-001`, not only account summary plus drill-down |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q008 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD006 |
|
||||
| Priority | High |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Provide one export-ready GL-001 dataset that combines account context and detailed move lines.
|
||||
- Include one row structure capable of representing opening rows, movement lines and closing rows.
|
||||
- Support the target GL-001 ordering: account, transaction currency, posting date, document number.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Final source table or SQL design until GL001-PD006 is confirmed.
|
||||
- Commodity-specific fields, handled by DEV-GL001-010.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- A consumer can retrieve all required GL-001 output columns from one logical dataset or service.
|
||||
- Account summary and line drill-down no longer have to be manually combined outside the reporting layer.
|
||||
- Dataset rows can be typed as opening, movement or closing without ambiguous interpretation.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Compare base-currency movement totals with existing Tryton general ledger totals for the same period and account selection.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-002 Transaction-currency grouping and balances
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Add transaction-currency grouping, filtering and running balances |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q004, GL001-Q009 |
|
||||
| Linked decisions | GL001-PD002 |
|
||||
| Priority | High |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Add transaction currency as a grouping key for GL-001.
|
||||
- Add transaction-currency filtering where supported by the selected implementation design.
|
||||
- Calculate or expose `balance_transaction_currency`.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Deciding whether empty `second_currency` means company currency; this is GL001-PD002.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- GL-001 can be grouped by account and transaction currency.
|
||||
- Running transaction-currency balances are available for movement rows.
|
||||
- Base-currency lines have a documented transaction-currency fallback or exclusion rule.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- For each account and transaction currency, opening plus movements equals closing once DEV-GL001-003 is available.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-003 Opening and closing rows
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Add opening and closing rows by account and transaction currency |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q009 |
|
||||
| Linked decisions | GL001-PD006 |
|
||||
| Priority | High |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Add explicit opening balance rows by account and transaction currency.
|
||||
- Add explicit closing balance rows by account and transaction currency.
|
||||
- Ensure movement rows sit between opening and closing rows in the exported ordering.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Storage versus reporting-layer calculation decision for transaction-currency opening balances.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- Each account and transaction-currency group has an opening row when relevant.
|
||||
- Each account and transaction-currency group has a closing row when relevant.
|
||||
- Opening, movement and closing row types are machine-readable in the dataset or export.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Opening balance plus period movements reconciles to closing balance for each account and transaction currency.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-004 Document and reference mapping
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Define mapping for `document_number`, `journal_entry_number`, `voucher_number` and `reference` |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q001, GL001-Q002, GL001-Q003 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD001 |
|
||||
| Priority | High |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Implement confirmed mappings for the GL-001 document and reference fields.
|
||||
- Preserve enough information to trace each line back to the accounting document and source document.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Choosing the final business meaning of each reference field.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- `document_number`, `journal_entry_number`, `voucher_number` and `reference` follow the confirmed decision.
|
||||
- Fields are populated consistently for accounting moves and AP-originated entries.
|
||||
- Empty optional values are intentionally blank, not silently overloaded.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Sample accounting entries can be traced from GL-001 output back to the accounting move and, where available, source invoice.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-005 Source document metadata
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Normalize source document metadata: document type, document date and supplier invoice number |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q006, GL001-Q012 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD004 |
|
||||
| Priority | High |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Populate `document_type`, `document_date` and `supplier_invoice_number` according to confirmed origin-model rules.
|
||||
- Support AP-related entries where supplier invoice information is available.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Commodity quantity mapping, handled by DEV-GL001-010.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- GL-001 exposes normalized source document metadata for confirmed origin models.
|
||||
- AP-related entries include `supplier_invoice_number` when available.
|
||||
- Non-AP entries follow a documented fallback or blank rule.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review a sample containing AP invoices, manual journal entries and other available origin types.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-006 Transaction-currency debit and credit split
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Split `amount_second_currency` into debit and credit transaction-currency columns |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q004 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD002 |
|
||||
| Priority | Medium |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Derive `debit_transaction_currency` and `credit_transaction_currency` from signed transaction-currency amounts.
|
||||
- Apply the same transaction-currency fallback rule used by DEV-GL001-002.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- GL credit sign convention, handled by DEV-GL001-007.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- Debit and credit transaction-currency columns are populated deterministically.
|
||||
- Zero, blank and base-currency-only cases follow documented rules.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Transaction-currency debit and credit totals reconcile to movement totals by account and currency.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-007 GL sign convention transformation
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Decide and implement GL sign convention transformation for credit columns |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q005 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD003 |
|
||||
| Priority | Medium |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Apply the confirmed GL-001 display convention for debit, credit and balances.
|
||||
- Ensure base-currency and transaction-currency amounts use consistent signs.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Changing Tryton accounting storage or standard UI conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- `debit_*` amounts are positive.
|
||||
- `credit_*` amounts follow the confirmed GL-001 convention.
|
||||
- Running balances are consistent with the exported debit and credit signs.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Sample entries reconcile between source Tryton amounts and GL-001 export amounts after documented transformation.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-008 Audit metadata columns
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Add audit columns `entered_by`, `entered_date`, `modified_by` and `modified_date` |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q010 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD007 |
|
||||
| Priority | Medium |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Expose creation and modification metadata for GL-001 rows where available.
|
||||
- Use consistent user and timestamp formatting across the report.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Defining shared audit mappings for all accounting reports unless GL001-Q010 is resolved that way.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- GL-001 includes `entered_by`, `entered_date`, `modified_by` and `modified_date`.
|
||||
- Missing metadata is handled consistently and visibly.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Compare exported values against source record creation and modification metadata for a sample of move lines.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-009 CSV and XLSX export
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Add dedicated CSV / XLSX export target |
|
||||
| Linked dependency | DEV-GL001-001 |
|
||||
| Priority | Medium |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Provide CSV and XLSX exports for the GL-001 flat dataset.
|
||||
- Preserve column order from `Reports/GL/GL_001_general_ledger.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Wide PDF export unless separately prioritized.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- CSV export includes all required GL-001 columns.
|
||||
- XLSX export includes all required GL-001 columns.
|
||||
- Column names match the report specification.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Exported row counts and totals match the underlying GL-001 dataset for the same parameters.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEV-GL001-010 Commodity quantity fields
|
||||
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| Source gap | Add `payable_qty` and `uom` for commodity-related postings using Tradon lot, invoice or fee links |
|
||||
| Linked questions | GL001-Q007, GL001-Q013 |
|
||||
| Linked decision | GL001-PD005 |
|
||||
| Priority | Low |
|
||||
| Status | Blocked |
|
||||
|
||||
Development scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Populate `payable_qty` and `uom` for commodity-related postings if retained for first implementation.
|
||||
- Document blank behavior for non-commodity postings.
|
||||
|
||||
Out of scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- Making commodity fields mandatory for all GL-001 rows.
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- Commodity-related GL rows expose payable quantity and unit of measure when source data is reliably available.
|
||||
- Non-commodity rows remain blank or follow a documented rule.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review a sample of commodity AP postings against source invoice, lot or fee evidence.
|
||||
38
DevelopmentBacklog/Tradon/README.md
Normal file
38
DevelopmentBacklog/Tradon/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Tradon Development Backlog
|
||||
|
||||
This folder converts assessed Tradon gaps into development backlog items.
|
||||
|
||||
The backlog is downstream from:
|
||||
|
||||
1. target report specifications in `Reports/`;
|
||||
2. incoming GAP analysis files retained in `Assessments/Tradon/<REPORT_CODE>/source_documents/`;
|
||||
3. structured assessment files in `Assessments/Tradon/<REPORT_CODE>/`.
|
||||
|
||||
Backlog items should be precise enough to drive development, but they should not invent source tables, SQL joins or implementation architecture before the relevant decisions are confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Item lifecycle
|
||||
|
||||
| Status | Meaning |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `Draft` | Candidate item derived from an assessment gap |
|
||||
| `Blocked` | Requires a pending business, mapping or architecture decision |
|
||||
| `Ready` | Scope and acceptance criteria are clear enough for development |
|
||||
| `In Progress` | Development work has started |
|
||||
| `Ready for Review` | Implementation is available for functional or technical review |
|
||||
| `Done` | Implemented, tested and accepted |
|
||||
| `Deferred` | Valid gap, not retained for the current delivery scope |
|
||||
|
||||
## Required fields
|
||||
|
||||
Each item should include:
|
||||
|
||||
- backlog ID;
|
||||
- source report;
|
||||
- source gap or assessment reference;
|
||||
- linked open point or decision;
|
||||
- development scope;
|
||||
- out of scope;
|
||||
- acceptance criteria;
|
||||
- validation or reconciliation checks;
|
||||
- priority;
|
||||
- status.
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ L'objectif du dossier est de maintenir un referentiel clair des rapports a produ
|
||||
| `-- Tradon/
|
||||
| |-- README.md
|
||||
| `-- GL_001/
|
||||
|-- DevelopmentBacklog/
|
||||
| `-- Tradon/
|
||||
| `-- GL_001_backlog.md
|
||||
|-- Reports/
|
||||
| |-- GL/
|
||||
| |-- STATUTORY/
|
||||
@@ -32,6 +35,8 @@ L'objectif du dossier est de maintenir un referentiel clair des rapports a produ
|
||||
| |-- TRADING/
|
||||
| |-- ANALYTICS/
|
||||
| `-- REPORTS_INDEX.md
|
||||
|-- Tradon/
|
||||
| `-- general_ledger_gap_analysis.md
|
||||
|-- security.toml
|
||||
`-- Open Squared Reporting.code-workspace
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +51,9 @@ L'objectif du dossier est de maintenir un referentiel clair des rapports a produ
|
||||
- `Docs/reporting_parameters.md` centralise les parametres communs.
|
||||
- `Docs/reporting_standards.md` fixe les conventions de champs, montants, signes et tris.
|
||||
- `Docs/Trad On - Rapports Comptables et Financiers.xlsx` est la source initiale de cadrage fonctionnel.
|
||||
- `Tradon/` recoit les GAP analysis initiales par rapport, potentiellement poussees par un autre utilisateur Git.
|
||||
- `Assessments/Tradon/` documente l'exposition des rapports cibles aux capacites Tryton / Tradon, les GAP, questions ouvertes et decisions.
|
||||
- `DevelopmentBacklog/Tradon/` transforme les gaps cadres en items de developpement tracables, testables et priorisables.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rapports specifies
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user